Health Care Furniture Design - Guidelines for Cleanability

April 11, 2017 | Formats: Guideline | Content Areas: Planning, Design, and Construction, Textile Management Operations | Tags:Design and Construction, Laundry and Textiles


1. Scope

The purpose of this Guideline is to provide guidance to furniture manufacturers and
healthcare professionals in understanding typical cleaners, disinfectants, cleaning
methods, and performance of furniture when exposed to these cleaners and
disinfectants. It is the intent of this guideline to bring the recommended manufacturers’
standards in line with existing practices and typically used cleaners. This guideline offers
standard test methodologies and specific performance recommendations to which
manufacturers can test; and to which users may evaluate relative product performance.
This guideline also provides product design considerations that support effective
cleanability of healthcare furniture products.

This Guideline applies to seating, tables, carts, storage and other furniture products as
used in healthcare patient care. This Guideline also applies to furniture intended for use
outside of patient care areas in healthcare environments as furniture is often used
interchangeably between patient care and non-patient care areas. These guidelines are
not necessarily applicable to health care areas such as offices or administrative areas.

This Guideline does not apply to healthcare products considered to be ‘equipment’
(patient lifts, beds, transfer benches, wheelchairs and other products covered by IEC
60601).

This guideline does not purport to address the effectiveness (i.e., the level of
disinfection) of any cleaning agent or cleaning process. Guidance is available in the
reference section for specific cleaning and disinfection protocols recommended by the
American Hospital Association. Only the effect on the subject material (textile, plastic,
finish, etc.) is assessed by the methodologies within this guideline.

It is the intent of this guideline to ensure compatibility of the health care setting’s cleaning
and disinfecting agents with the items and surfaces to be cleaned. Materials and finishes
must be compatible with hospital-grade detergents, cleaners and disinfectants for best
results.

Authors of this Guideline consider furniture to be ‘Non-critical’ per the Spaulding
Classification System (See Definitions). Non-critical items such as furniture come in
contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes.

The tests for resistance of furniture to cleaners is based upon typical cleaning of one
time per day and a furniture life of 7 years. This furniture life is based on input from a
variety of health care professionals; furniture is often replaced based on
aesthetic/appearance considerations needed to maintain a perception of cleanliness and
clinical credibility within a facility. This life is not necessarily based on the structural
durability of the products.

2. Product Assessment

Designing products for the healthcare environment has unique challenges as the needs
from facility to facility are varied. Therefore, this Guideline is intended to provide
direction to manufacturers, specifers, and users of healthcare furniture, but is not a
mandate of conformance. The test guidelines are primarily ‘should’ rather than ‘shall’
given the unique needs in the healthcare environment. Manufacturers, specifiers, and
users should determine relevant requirements based upon their specific needs.

3. Background

Note: In addition to those stakeholders listed in the Foreword and Acknowledgements,
guidance is also taken from:

  • “CDC Guidelines for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities” by
    Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Chapel
    Hill, NC (2008)
  • “Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare Facilities” by
    (HICPAC), Atlanta, GA (2003)
  • “Best Practices for Environmental Cleaning for Prevention and Control of
    Infections - In All Health Care Settings” by the Provincial Infectious Diseases
    Advisory Committee (PIDAC), Toronto, Canada (2009)
  • "Practice Guidance for Healthcare Environmental Cleaning: The Essential
    Resource for Environmental Cleaning and Disinfection," 2nd ed., Association for
    the Healthcare Environment of the American Hospital Association, (2012)

Health care settings are complex environments that contain a large diversity of microbial
flora, many of which may constitute a risk to the clients/patients/residents, staff and
visitors in the environment. The consequences of transmission of microorganisms
within a health care setting may be more severe. High-touch environmental surfaces of
the health care setting hold a greater risk than do public areas of non-health care
organizations, due to the nature of activity performed in the health care setting and the
transient (chair-to-chair, for example) behavior of patients with heightened susceptibility,
bacterial colonization among clinical staff, employees, patients and visitors within the
health care setting, which increases the likelihood of direct and indirect contact with
contaminated surfaces. Transmission involves:

  1. presence of an infectious agent (e.g. bacterium, virus, fungus) on equipment,
    objects and surfaces in the health care environment;
  2. a means for the infectious agent to transfer from patient-to-patient, patient-to-staff,
    staff-to-patient or staff-to-staff; and
  3. presence of susceptible clients/patients/residents, staff and visitors.

In the health care setting, the role of environmental cleaning is important because it
reduces the number and amount of infectious agents that may be present and may also
eliminate routes of transfer of microorganisms from one person/object to another,
thereby reducing the risk of infection. There are five parameters, which influence the
effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection: contact time, temperature, concentration,
mechanical action, and pH. Upholstery cleaning presents different challenges than other
surfaces, primarily due to the wide variety of textile fibers, porosity, durability, and stain
resistance.

Furniture manufacturers are interested in these factors as they impact the design,
geometry, materials, finishes/textiles, and mechanisms used, in the overall cleanability of
furniture.

4. Definitions/Terminology

Notes:

  • Refer to BIFMA PD-1 Mechanical Test Definitions for related terms not included in
    this guideline. Otherwise, the common dictionary definition shall be used for
    terms not defined in this section or in BIFMA PD-1. In case of a conflict between
    the definitions in this guideline and PD-1, the definitions in this guideline shall apply.

  • Some of these definitions were taken from “CDC Guidelines for Disinfection and
    Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities” by Healthcare Infection Control Practices
    Advisory Committee (HICPAC), Chapel Hill, NC (2008), and from “Best Practices
    for Environmental Cleaning for Prevention and Control of Infections - In All Health
    Care Settings” by the Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee (PIDAC),
    Toronto, Canada (2009). Other definitions were provided by the authors of this
    guideline.

  • These terms are provided for reference as they are often used in health care
    settings. Inclusion within this section does not necessarily mean they are used
    within the text of this guideline.

Alcohol-based Hand Rub (ABHR): A liquid, gel or foam formulation of alcohol (e.g.,
ethanol, isopropanol) which is used to reduce the number of microorganisms on hands in
clinical situations when the hands are not visibly soiled. ABHRs contain emollients to
reduce skin irritation and are less time-consuming to use than washing with soap and
water.

Antimicrobial Products: substances or mixtures of substances designed to destroy or
suppress the growth of harmful microorganisms, whether bacteria, viruses, or fungi on
inanimate objects or surfaces. These products are typically used for two purposes:

  1. Disinfect, sanitize, reduce or mitigate growth of development of
    microbiolical organisms.
  2. Protect inanimate objects (floors, walls and/or furniture), industrial
    processes or systems, surfaces, water, or other chemical substances from
    contamination, fouling, or deterioration caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi,
    protozoa, algae, or slime.

BIFMA: Business and Institutional Furniture Manufacturer’s Association, a not-for-profit
trade association of furniture manufacturers and suppliers.

Chemical Sterilant: Kills spores with prolonged exposure times (3 – 12 hours).

Cleanability: The ability to be cleaned; easily and without damage. To be maintained in
an unsoiled appearance.

Cleaning: The removal of visible soil (e.g., organic and inorganic material) from objects
and surfaces that normally is accomplished manually or mechanically using water with
detergents or enzymatic products. Thorough cleaning is essential before high-level
disinfection and sterilization because inorganic and organic materials that remain on the 
surfaces of instruments interfere with the effectiveness of these processes. See also
Disinfection, Sterilization. Note: high-level disinfection and sterilization is not covered by
this document. Only hospital-grade surface sanitizer use for low- or intermediate-level
disinfection is covered.

Cleaning Residue: the material left behind following the cleaning or disinfecting of
surfaces. Residue tends to be left or will build up if the cleaning agent is left to air dry
(contact time is passed) or used incorrectly.

Coated Fabrics: A textile or similar substrate that is surfaced with one or more layers of
a film-forming polymer such as vinyl or polyurethane.

Construction Clean: Cleaning performed at the end of a workday by construction
workers that removes gross soil and dirt, construction materials and workplace hazards.
Cleaning may include sweeping and vacuuming, but usually does not address horizontal
surfaces or areas adjacent to the job site.

Contamination: The presence of an infectious agent on hands or on a surface such as
clothes, gowns, gloves, bedding, toys, surgical instruments, patient care equipment,
dressings or other inanimate objects.

Detergent: A synthetic cleansing agent that can emulsify oil and suspend soil. A
detergent contains surfactants that do not precipitate in hard water and may also contain
protease enzymes (see Enzymatic Cleaner) and whitening agents.

Discharge Cleaning: See Terminal Cleaning

Disinfectant: A product that is used on surfaces or medical equipment/devices which
results in disinfection of the equipment/device. Disinfectants are applied only to
inanimate objects. Some products combine a cleaner with a disinfectant. See also
Cleaning, Sterilization.

Disinfection: The inactivation of disease-producing microorganisms. A process that
eliminates many or all pathogenic microorganisms, except bacterial spores, on inanimate
objects. Medical equipment/devices must be cleaned thoroughly before effective
disinfection can take place. See also, Disinfectant, Cleaning, Sterilization.

  • Low-Level Disinfectant: agent that destroys all vegetative bacteria (except
    tubercle bacilli), lipid viruses, some non-lipid viruses, and some fungi, but not
    bacterial spores.
  • Intermediate-Level Disinfectant: agent that destroys all vegetative bacteria,
    including tubercle bacilli, lipid and some non-lipid viruses, and fungi, but not
    bacterial spores.

Double Cleaning: Repeating a cleaning regimen immediately after it has been done
once. Double cleaning is not the same as cleaning twice per day.

Enzymatic Cleaner: A pre-cleaning agent which contains enzymes that break down
proteins, fats and carbohydrates, such as blood, body fluids, secretions and excretions
from surfaces and equipment. Most enzymatic cleaners also contain a detergent.
Enzymatic cleaners are used to loosen and dissolve organic substances prior to cleaning.
Protease enzymes break down proteins, lipase proteins break down fats and amylase
enzymes break down starches and carbohydrates.

Germicide: An agent that can kill microorganisms, particularly pathogenic or disease
causing germs.

Hand Hygiene: A general term referring to any action of hand cleaning. Hand hygiene
relates to the removal of visible soil and removal or killing of transient microorganisms
from the hands. Hand hygiene may be accomplished using soap and running water or an
alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). Hand hygiene includes surgical hand antisepsis.

Hand Washing: The physical removal of microorganisms from the hands using soap
(plain or antimicrobial) and running water.

Hazardous Material (Chemical) Spills: Any spill of a material that requires specific or
specialized handling or methodologies as part of the clean-up protocol. These
hazardous materials can include chemicals, cleaning agents, medicines/medications
/chemotherapy agents, etc.

Hazardous Material (Biological/Blood-Borne) Spills: Any contamination by biological
secretion/excretion such as blood, body fluids and fecal material that require specific or
specialized handling methodology as part of the clean-up protocol.

Health Care Environment: People and items which make up the care environment
(e.g., objects, medical equipment, staff, clients/patients/residents) of a hospital, clinic or
ambulatory setting, outside the immediate environment of the client/patient/resident. See
also, Environment of the Client/Patient/Resident.

Health Care Facility: A permanent or mobile facility that supports the delivery of health-
related services. A health care facility does not include a client/patient/resident’s home or
physician/dental/other health offices where health care may be provided.

High-Touch Surfaces: High-touch surfaces are those that have frequent contact with
hands. Examples include all seat surfaces except the underside and base, table top
surfaces, cart top surfaces, and fronts of cabinets.

Hospital Clean: The measure of cleanliness routinely maintained in client /patient
/resident care areas of the health care setting. Hospital Clean is ‘Hotel Clean’ with the
addition of disinfection, increased frequency of cleaning, auditing and other infection
control measures in client/patient/resident care areas.

Hospital-Grade Disinfectant: A low-level disinfectant that is registered by the EPA for
pesticidal control of microorganisms which pose a threat to human health. Hospital
disinfectants are tested by the EPA after release into the market to verify antimicrobial
claims and chemical formulations. The list of products found to be efficacious by the EPA
is given here: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/atp-product-list.pdf.

Hotel Clean: A measure of cleanliness based on visual appearance that includes dust
and dirt removal, waste disposal and cleaning of windows and surfaces. Hotel clean is
the basic level of cleaning that takes place in all areas of a health care setting.

Infection: The entry and multiplication of an infectious agent in the tissues of the host.
Asymptomatic or sub-clinical infection is an infectious process running a course similar to
that of clinical disease but below the threshold of clinical symptoms. Symptomatic or
clinical infection is one resulting in clinical signs and symptoms (disease).
Infectious Agent: A microorganism, i.e., a bacterium, fungus, parasite, virus or prion,
which is capable of invading body tissues, multiplying and causing infection.

Low-Level Disinfection (LLD): Level of disinfection required when processing non-
invasive medical equipment (i.e., non-critical equipment) and some environmental
surfaces. Equipment and surfaces must be thoroughly cleaned prior to low-level
disinfection.

Low-Touch Surfaces: Surfaces that have minimal contact with hands. Examples
include the underside of seating surfaces, chair bases, underside and legs of tables,
underside and base of carts, and backside and inside of cabinets.

Manufacturer: Any person, partnership or incorporated association that manufactures
and sells medical equipment/devices under its own name or under a trade mark, design,
trade name or other name or mark owned or controlled by it.

Medical Equipment/Device: Any instrument, apparatus, appliance, material, or other
article, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to be used
for human beings for the purpose of diagnosis, prevention, monitoring, treatment or
alleviation of disease, injury or handicap; investigation, replacement, or modification of
the anatomy or of a physiological process; or control of conception.

Noncritical Medical Equipment/Device: Equipment/device that either touches only
intact skin (but not mucous membranes) or does not directly touch the
client/patient/resident. Reprocessing of noncritical equipment/devices involves cleaning
and may also require low-level disinfection (e.g., blood pressure cuffs, stethoscopes,
furniture).

Permeability: as used here; the resistance that a material or combination of materials
provides to the penetration of liquids to the other side of the material or combination of
materials.

Non-porous: surfaces or barriers that are impermeable to moisture. Typically these
include surfaces such as plastics, laminates, some wood finishes, non-perforated coated
fabrics (e.g., some vinyl and polyurethanes) and metals (including coated/finished).
Barrier materials such as membranes, films, laminations, etc., may also be considered
non-porous.

Safety Data Sheet (SDS): A document that contains information on the potential
hazards (health, fire, reactivity and environmental) and how to work safely with a
chemical product. It also contains information on the use, storage, handling and
emergency procedures all related to the hazards of the material. SDSs are prepared by
the supplier or manufacturer of the material.

Spaulding Classification System to Levels of Disinfection: Instruments and items for
patient care are divided into three categories based on the degree of risk of infection.

  • Critical: High risk of infection, used on tissues that are sterile or in the vascular
    system. Spores must be eliminated by sterilization. Examples of this equipment
    include surgical instruments in surgery.
  • Semi-critical: Items that come into contact with mucous membranes or non-intact
    skin. Examples are respiratory therapy equipment, GI endoscopes,
    bronchoscopes, etc. These items must be free of all microorganisms although
    small numbers of bacterial spores may be present after high-level disinfection.
  • Non-critical: Items that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous
    membranes. Examples include: blood pressure cuffs, crutches, bedrails, bedside
    tables, and patient furniture. Most non-critical reusable items can be disinfected
    where they are used and do not need to be transported to a central processing
    area.

Sterilization: Destroys or eliminates all microorganisms using chemical and physical
means.

Terminal Cleaning: The thorough cleaning of a client/patient/resident room or bed
space following discharge, death or transfer of the client/patient/resident, in order to
remove contaminating microorganisms that might be acquired by subsequent occupants
and/or staff.

Workstation: A group of furniture items and components where a person performs work.

5. Cleaning Agents/Disinfectants Typically Used for Healthcare Furniture

At the time of writing of this Guideline, the materials listed below were those most
commonly used in healthcare facilities and are specifically covered by this guideline in
the cleaning evaluation methodologies and criteria. The typical concentrations given
should be used for testing for generic products. If other concentrations are expected to
be used, those concentrations should be evaluated by the method given below. If the
evaluation methodologies and criteria given in this guideline are used for other
cleaning/disinfection agents the manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU) should be
followed. Any deviation from concentrations or reagents used for testing should be
noted in any test reports or conformance statements.

Notes:

  • Cleaning Agents/Disinfectants should be approved by the appropriate
    department(s) within the healthcare facility.
  • By law, all applicable label instructions on EPA-registered1 products must be
    followed. If the user selects exposure conditions that differ from those on the EPA-
    registered product label, the user assumes liability for any injuries resulting from
    off-label use and is potentially subject to enforcement action under the Federal
    Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
    • The following website lists all post-market hospital-grade disinfectants that have been
      tested by the EPA: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/atp-product-list.pdf
    • The following website gives EPA's complete list of disinfectants registered as effective
      against various pathogens: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/chemregindex.htm
    • Acute care hospitals are required to use EPA registered disinfectants intended for health
      care use.
    • See this list of all disinfectants registered with specific microorganism claims:
      http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/chemregindex.htm.
    • Note that not all registered products have been tested and confirmed by the EPA as
      efficacious against their pre-market label claims. Only those products listed by the EPA
      above as "Agency Confirmed Efficacy" in post-market testing should be considered for
      materials compatibility testing.
    • Furniture manufacturers are encouraged to test surface materials using products that are
      EPA registered hospital-grade disinfectants.
  • Cleaning residue left by cleaning agent residue may continue to degrade surfaces
    and shorten their life and/or affect their appearance. Manufacturers may
    recommend a final rinse with a clean damp cloth to remove residue.
  • Any specific cleaning materials (including name brands) given in the list below are
    given for purposes of testing consistency only. They are not given as
    recommendations or endorsements.
  • Contact/dwell time for any cleaning/disinfecting agent is important and will
    typically vary depending on the IFUs (Instructions For Use) provided by the
    manufacturer.

5.1 Bleach: sodium hypochlorite2 in a 5.25 - 6.25% dilution is an intermediate level
disinfectant (use label recommendation for mixing bleach with water – typical is 10:1
water to bleach). Bleach is one of the few agents that are registered and tested as
effective against Clostridium difficile, although chlorine dioxide has also been tested by
the EPA as efficacious. See this list of all disinfectants registered with C. diff. claims:
http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/cdif-guidance.html; note that not all registered products
have been tested as efficacious against their pre-market label claims.

5.2 Peroxide: in a 3.0% solution, sometimes accelerated with acid, hydrogen peroxide
can be either a low or intermediate level disinfectant, depending on the specific product
formulation. Some peroxide products meet the EcoLogo product labeling requirements
and may be used in green cleaning programs adopted by healthcare facilities to meet
green certification requirements. Hydrogen peroxide plasma or misting applications are
not covered in this guideline.

5.3 UV lights: The wavelength of UV radiation ranges from 210 to 328 nm (2100 to
3280 A) at 2-6 mw/cm2. 200-280 nm is typically considered to be the UVC range. (The
maximum bactericidal effect of Ultraviolet light occurs at 254 nm. Cycle time exposures
are determined by the lamp manufacturer, and lamps should not be used in the
presence of humans).

5.4 Alcohol: Isopropyl and ethyl alcohol at 55-70%, and usually used in combination
with quaternary ammonium salts or as 70% isopropyl alcohol, can be effective against
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. See this list of all disinfectants registered with specific
microorganism claims: http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/chemregindex.htm. (Alcohol is
limited in use but is typically used when it’s convenient, for example – alcohol wipes
might be in the room and a staff person will use them for minor cleaning).

5.5 Quaternary Ammonium (Quats): low level disinfectants that will kill most bacteria,
viruses and fungi. Some Quats alone without phenolics or alcohol may not be effective
against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but are commonly used as the routine disinfectant
product in healthcare applications. Quaternary ammonium compounds effectively
remove and/or inactivate lesser-resistant microorganisms such as Stapholococci
aureus
, vancomycin-resistant Entercoccus, P. aeruginosa] from surfaces. Refer to the
EPA registered products listed on their website for specific claims. (One such product is
PDI Hospital Disinfectant Cleaner).

5.6 Phenolic: intermediate level disinfectants that are effective against Mycobacterium 
tuberculosis;
however, due to toxicity and environmental concerns they are being phased
out of common use. Refer to the EPA registered products listed on their website for
specific claims. (One such product is Wexcide 128).

5.7 Steam: The vapor into which water is converted when heated. In healthcare, steam
may be used to get rid of bed bugs and other infestations, and/or other infectious agents
in upholstered furniture.

5.8 Chlorine Dioxide: intermediate level disinfectant in a 2.0 - 5.0% concentration.
Although effective against C. diff., its use is not widespread in healthcare applications.
Refer to the EPA registered products listed on their website for specific claims. (One such
product is International Dioxide’s Anthium Dioxide).

Note: For Sections 6 – 8, testing should be conducted in an environment of 70 deg
+/- 6, and 50% RH +/- 15%. Samples should be preconditioned for at least 4
hours prior to testing. Deviations from the temperature, humidity, and preconditioning
parameters should be noted in the test report.

6. Screening of Finishes to Liquid Cleaner Resistance

6.1 Applicability

This test applies to all non-porous furniture materials subject to cleaning/disinfection in
the healthcare setting. This test does not apply to woven textile surfaces nor coated
fabrics. See Section 7 for coated fabrics.

6.2 Purpose of Test
The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of furniture surfaces to withstand the
application of liquid cleaners/disinfectants.

6.3 Test Setup
Prepare the surface for testing by cleaning with a clean damp cloth (distilled water)
and allow it to dry. Place the test sample on a level surface. If the surface geometry of
the product does not allow for testing per the following procedure, representative
samples of the finish/substrate combinations may be used. Each reagent used for
testing should be at the manufacturer’s ready to use concentration or dilution as
specified in their Instructions For Use, but conforming to Section 5.

6.4 Test Procedure

6.4.1 Place a one-inch square 100% cotton cloth on the surface to be tested.
For each reagent listed, apply enough of the reagent to saturate the cloth
or paper (use of an eye-dropper or pipette is recommended).

  • Distilled water (control)

  • Bleach (diluted 10:1 water-to-bleach from bleach concentrate per 5.1) 

  • Hydrogen Peroxide

  • Quaternary Ammonium (diluted per manufacturer’s instruction*)

  • Alcohol - Isopropyl

  • Phenolic (diluted per manufacturer’s instruction*)

* Manufacturers may also want to consider effect of full-concentration
applications for information only – no acceptance criteria.

6.4.2 Immediately cover the reagent with a 2 in. diameter watch glass.

6.4.3 Allow the reagent to remain covered for 15 minutes.

6.4.4 Remove the watch glass and remove the reagent with a clean cloth.

6.4.5 Wipe the test area with a clean cloth and distilled water. 

6.4.6 Allow the surface to air dry for 1 hour.

6.4.7 Evaluate the product to the acceptance level in 6.5.

6.5 Acceptance Level

The reagents should not affect the color of the surface. There should be no tackiness
to the surface or softening of the surface/finish as compared to the unreacted
surface. There should be no cracking or crazing of the surface.

For products with an initial Gloss reading of 20 or greater, a gloss change of up
to 25% is acceptable. For example, products with an existing gloss reading of 40,
should not fall below 30. (60-degree Glossmeter)

For products with an existing Gloss reading of 20 or less, a gloss change of up to 5
points is acceptable.

7. Screening of Coated Fabrics* to Liquid Cleaner Resistance

Note: The Association for Contract Textiles (ACT) has created the following test method
as a possible tool for determining the effect of liquid cleaners on coated and woven
fabrics*. In order to validate the test, ACT members are evaluating the protocol
described in 7.1 through 7.5. This evaluation was not completed at the time of BIFMA
HCF 8.1-2014 publication date.

*Test method was originally written for coated fabrics. It is currently being evaluated for it’s
applicability to woven fabrics as well. The BIFMA Healthcare Furniture Subcommittee made
a few modifications to the ACT proposal.

7.1 Applicability

The following is a suggested protocol for the testing of cleaners and/or disinfectants on
coated fabrics*. The test method outlined is to evaluate the material’s relative
resistance or compatibility to specific cleaners and/or disinfectant chemistries and is not
an approval or recommendation of said cleaners and or/disinfectants.

This test method is not intended to replicate a ‘real world’ scenario as there is no way to
predict use (or misuse) of cleaners and/or disinfectants within an environment.

7.2 Purpose of Test

The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of coated fabrics* used for furniture
surfaces to withstand the application of liquid cleaners/disinfectants.

7.3 Test Setup

Utilize a minimum of 254 mm x 254 mm (10-inch x10-inch) piece of coated fabric*.

Provide enough cleaner and/or disinfectant for 6 applications per day for a 14 working
day test period.

i.e. Cleanings (Wipes) required – Minimum of 84 cleaning (wipes) would be required
to complete test. Place the test sample on a level surface. Each reagent used for
testing should be at the concentration given in Section 5.

7.4 Test Procedure

7.4.1
Using indelible marker or No. 2 pencil divide the 254 mm x 254 mm (10-
inch x 10-inch) piece of material into two 127 mm x 254 mm (5-inch x 10-
inch) sections by drawing a line down the center. Label the left side with
cleaner name and test initiation date. The left side is to remain the control
for visual comparison reference. The right side is the only side in which
the cleaner and/or disinfectant is to be applied.

7.4.2 Lay the 254 mm x 254 mm (10-inch x 10-inch) piece of material on flat
surface.

7.4.3 Apply cleaner/disinfectant to surface of entire right side of material as
instructed on label (proper dilution and application method i.e. wipe, spray
bottle or both). With standard cleaning pressure wipe entire right half
surface with a clean dry cloth using standard cleaning motion (circular or
back and forth) for a minimum of 10 times. Allow to either air dry or apply
clean water rinse as instructed on label.

  • If label calls for air dry and does not call for clean water rinse it
    is recommended to run a second test using the same
    cleaner/disinfectant with the addition of a clean water rinse (and
    wipe dry) after application to determine if there is a significant
    difference when testing is completed.

Repeat recommended application method 6 times per day for a 14 working
day period.

7.5 Acceptance Level

After each application the right half of the test specimen should be reviewed and
compared to the control side (left) for visual differences such as:

General Appearance (in some instances this may include gloss) –

  • No effect -- no change in color or surface finish.
  • Slight effect -- a change in color or surface finish only visible at
    certain angles or directions.
  • Moderate effect -- a change in color or surface finish visible from all
    angles and directions, but does not appreciably alter the
    original condition of the specimen.
  • Severe effect -- a change in color or surface finish, which obviously
    and markedly alters the original condition of the specimen.

General Appearance – Not acceptable beyond slight effect as noted above.
Discoloring – Not acceptable beyond slight effect as noted above.
Cracking or peeling – Not acceptable
Enhanced Crocking – Not acceptable
Bubbling - Not acceptable

8. Resistance of Furniture to Steam Exposure

8.1 Applicability
This test applies to all furniture items/materials including textile-covered surfaces
subject to steam exposure for purposes of killing pests.

8.2 Purpose of Test
The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of furniture surfaces to withstand
steam applications.

8.3 Test Setup (See Figure 1)
Prepare the surface for testing by cleaning with a clean damp cloth and allow it to
dry. Place the test sample on a level surface.

The test shall include:

8.3.1 NEMA cup found in NEMA LD-3 Section 3.5.
8.3.2 Heating apparatus to heat the cup.
8.3.3 Structure to hold the material ½-inch above the cup.

Figure 1 - Steam Exposure
Figure 1 - Steam Exposure

8. Test Procedure

8.4.1 Follow the general guidelines given in NEMA LD-3 Section 3.5. Place 350
ml of distilled water in a NEMA vessel found in Section 3.5.

8.4.2 Place the cup filled with water on a hot plate, until the water is at a vigorous
boil.

8.4.3 After steam is rising from the vessel, place the material ½ inch from the top
of the container.

8.4.4 Time the steam exposure to 30 seconds. It will be evident that steam is in
contact with the surface by condensation forming on the surface.

8.4.5 After 30 seconds, remove the sample from the steam exposure and wipe
any remaining water away with a dry paper towel.

8.4.6 Allow the surface to dry completely. After one hour evaluate the
appearance of the surface according to the following:

  • No effect -- no change in color or surface finish.
  • Slight effect -- a change in color or surface finish only visible at certain
    angles or directions.
  • Moderate effect -- a change in color or surface finish visible from all angles
    and directions, but does not appreciably alter the original
    condition of the specimen.
  • Severe effect -- a change in color or surface finish, which obviously and
    markedly alters the original condition of the specimen.

8.5 Acceptance Level
The test surface shall show no more than a slight effect.

9. Resistance of Furniture to UV Lights

9.1 Applicability

This test applies to all furniture materials subject to UV wavelength disinfection in the
healthcare setting. (An alternate to this test is to subject the sample(s) to 40 hours
per ASTM G155 Standard Practice for Operating Xenon Arc Light Apparatus for
Exposure of Non-Metallic Materials).

9.2 Purpose of Test

The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of furniture surfaces to withstand UV
wavelength disinfection.

9.3 Test Setup

The test apparatus shall include:

9.3.1 A germicidal light source capable of providing radiant energy in the spectral
UVC wavelength region (200-280 nm), with the majority of the radiation at
254 nm.

9.3.2 A cabinet or otherwise means to isolate the light source and a mounting
surface with uniform irradiation for sample exposure.

9.3.3 Overhead white fluorescent lights with bulb(s) positioned parallel to the line
of sight and providing an intensity of 800 to 1100 lux (75 to 100 ft-ca) on
the specimen surface.

9.3.4 A spectrophotometer if CIE L*a*b* readings are desired.

9.4 Test Procedure

Apply a UVC light source to achieve 291 kJ/m2 (+/- 15 kJ/m2) radiation within 12 to 24
hours. GE G36T5 UVC lamp applies 500 uW/cm2 irradiation at 16 inches to achieve
this dose in 16 hours. Any similar UVC germicidal light source is satisfactory.

9.4.1 Measure the light intensity after a warm up period sufficient to achieve
stable irradiation. Determine the exposure time necessary to achieve 291
kJ/m2. Sper Scientific UVC Light Meter, Model 850010, or similar is
satisfactory to measure irradiation.

9.4.2 Establish initial L*a*b* readings if color values are used. For wood
surfaces identify the location so that subsequent readings may be made in
the same location. Disregard if only visual assessment is used. Uniform
color surfaces may be measured in exposed and unexposed areas after
the exposure, if desired.

9.4.3 Cover approximately 1/2 the sample with aluminum foil or other mask;
across the grain for wood surfaces. Sample size of 100 mm x 200 mm (4 in.
x 8 in.) is suggested.

9.4.4 Up to four samples may be tested at once by placing the unmasked ends of
the four samples together in a 200 mm x 200 mm (8 in. x 8 in.) sample area
centered under the lamp. Placing the samples within this area minimizes
the irradiation variation to +/- 5%. Expose the sample in UVC light until 291
kJ/m2 (+/- 15 kJ/m2) is achieved.

9.4.5 Establish final L*a*b* readings as appropriate. For visual assessment
position the conditioned sample on a table and view it at an eye- to-
sample distance of approximately 750-900 mm (30-36 in.) and at an angle
of approximately 45-75 degrees from the horizontal plane. The sample
shall be rotated in the horizontal plane and viewed from all directions.
Direct sunlight or other angle light sources, which can accentuate or
minimize the effects shall be avoided.

9.4.6 The light resistance shall be reported as one of the following:

  • No effect—no change in color or surface gloss.
  • Slight effect—a change in color or surface gloss visible only at certain
    angles and directions.
  • Moderate effect—a change in color or surface gloss visible at all angles
    and directions but does not notably alter the original condition of the
    specimen.
  • Severe effect—a change in color or surface gloss, which markedly alters
    the original condition of the specimen.

9.5 Acceptance Level

The test surface shall show no more than a slight effect by visual assessment. The
test surface shall show a delta E of 2.0 or less.

9.6 Background UVC Germicidal Exposure

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recognizes that UVC light, wavelength 200-
280 nm, has a germicidal effect on microorganisms and its use has widespread
commercial acceptance as a method to disinfect bacteria, viruses, mold and spores(1).
Peak germicidal effectiveness occurs at 254 nm by damaging the DNA of
microorganisms and rendering them unable to replicate. Typically germicidal low-
pressure mercury vapor lamps have a peak output of 254 nm and are commonly used
in commercial portable disinfection systems(2-3). Several companies produce UVC
disinfection systems and many studies have shown the effectiveness of using this
technique to kill harmful microorganisms(4).

Studies applied UVC doses of 12,000 uWs/cm2 to 36,000 uWs/cm2 achieved in times
ranging from 15 to 50 minutes to achieve Log 2-4 kill rates of MRSA, VRE, and
Clostridium difficle (5-8). C. difficle is recognized as a primary pathogen causing
healthcare associated infections and is among the most difficult to disinfect (9). Killing
C. difficle may be considered a benchmark for effective disinfection. One time UVC
exposure to kill C. difficle is in the order of 0.8 kJ/m2 [10]. This is at the high
end of reported UVC disinfection doses; therefore this dose should be sufficient to
kill nearly all pathogens at a Log4 kill rate. Seven years has been proposed for the
life statement for the Healthcare Furniture Cleaning Guideline (BIFMA H1-201X).
Weekly exposure for 7 years gives a total germicidal dose of 291 kJ/m2.
Therefore, a total exposure of 291 kJ/m2 using a germicidal lamp operating at 254
nm output is suggested to represent germicidal exposure to be addressed by the
Healthcare Furniture Guideline.

References:

  1. CDC Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, pg. 54, 2008.
  2. Steris Pathogen UV Disinfection System:
    http://webapi.steris.com/api/salesconnection/getdocumentbynumber?id=SD970&fileName=PATHOGON%20UV%20DISINFECTION%20SYSTEM.pdf 
  3. UV Lamps for Germicidal Applications:
    http://www.gelighting.com/LightingWeb/br/images/Germicidal_Lamps_Brochure_EN_tcm388-12723.pdf
  4. TruD Smart UVC Room Disinfection: http://www.tru-d.com/studies.html
  5. Comparison of UV C Light and Chemicals for Disinfection of Surfaces in Hospital
    Isolation Units. B. M. Andersen, MD, PhD; H. Bånrud, DrScient; E. Bøe, BcEcon, MEng;
    O. Bjordal, MEng; F. Drangsholt, PhD Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol.
    27, No. 7 (July 2006) (pp. 729-734) http://www.jstor.org/stable/full/10.1086/503643
  6. Room Decontamination with UV Radiation, Infection Control and Hospital
    Epidemiology, Oct. 2010. http://www.uv-clean.co/downloads/UV-rutala.pdf
  7. Evaluation of an Automated Ultraviolet Radiation Device for Decontamination of
    Clostridium difficle and other Healthcare-Associated Pathogens in Hospital Rooms:
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2334-10-197.pdf
  8. American Air and Water, UV Irradiation Dosage Table:
    http://www.americanairandwater.com/uv-facts/uv-dosage.htm
  9. Elimination of Clostridium difficle by Illumination? Surface Disinfection by Ultraviolet
    Light Treatment: http://www.trud.com/docs/Elimination_of_clostridium_difficile_by_illumination.pdf
  10. Email from Deborah Martinez, Executive Director, International Ultraviolet
    Association, 11/21/13.

Appendix 1: Furniture Cleanability Design Considerations

Surfaces in Health Care Settings
a) Non-upholstered surfaces should be capable of being easily cleaned;
minimize surface joints and seams.

  • Joints and seams complicate effective cleaning, creating organism reservoirs
    that can further the spread of contact transmitted healthcare associated infections.
  • A space between the chair back and seat can facilitate cleaning.
  • Nonporous, smooth solid surfaces such as laminate or poly resin products
    facilitate effective cleaning. Textured surfaces may result in additional
    cleaner dwell time or cleaning cycles, however, they may also decrease
    skin/surface contact area, which may lead to decreased bacterial
    transmission.
  • Finishes on hard surfaces that are scratched or chipped allow for
    accumulation of microorganisms and make them more difficult to clean
    and disinfect.
  • Furnishings must be able to withstand cleaning and be compatible with
    clinical practice and hospital-grade detergents, cleaners and disinfectants.
  • Organic substrates (e.g., unfinished wood) should be avoided in
    hospital areas with immunocompromised patients; all exposed wood
    surfaces should be sealed/finished such that they are and remain nonporous.
  • Surfaces that require high levels of cleaning/disinfecting, such as
    armrests, should have large radii along edges.
  • Inside radii on adjacent (cove) surfaces to avoid entrapment of materials
    and permit effective cleaning; larger inside radii are preferred.
  • Abutting surfaces should have minimal radii to avoid creation of crevices
    that are difficult to clean. Example – adjacent work surfaces.
  • Effective cleaning can be facilitated using support surfaces that can be cleaned
    from both sides, and/or by using materials that do not absorb or hold
    fluids/moisture, etc. Seating support surfaces using slings, mesh and similar
    materials are encouraged for such use. Such surfaces also allow for effective
    cleaning of under surfaces and support structures.

b) Upholstered Furniture (or Surfaces) in Patient Care Areas

  • The following types of high-performance (durable, stain-resistant and easy-to-
    clean) upholstery fabrics are currently used extensively in healthcare patient
    spaces. These fabrics can be, and are being, aggressively cleaned and
    disinfected with a wide range of popular disinfectants. Fabric supplier
    recommendations and limitations—in conjunction with healthcare facilities and
    their infection-control specialists or advisors (e.g., Centers for Disease Control)
    and housekeeping staff—determine appropriate use according to the demands of
    each specific space.
    • Coated fabrics such as PVC (vinyl), PU (polyurethane), composites, silicone.
    • Woven fabrics treated with stain-resistant finishes and fluid barriers that
      are designed to prevent moisture and liquids from penetrating the fabric.
    • 100% polyester woven fabrics that utilize high-energy dyes, stainresistant finishes (or both), with fluid barriers.
  • Upholstered surfaces used in patient care areas should be impervious (nonporous); untreated (non-high performance) woven fabrics should not be used.
  • Upholstered surfaces should be durable and resist tearing, peeling, cracking or
    splitting; damaged surfaces are more difficult to clean effectively.
  • Upholstered furniture in patient care areas should be covered with fabrics that
    are fluid-resistant, non-porous and can withstand cleaning with hospital-grade
    disinfectants; microorganisms have been shown to survive on porous fabrics
    such as cotton, cotton terry, nylon and polyester, and on plastics such as
    polyurethane and polypropylene.
  • Upholstery fabrics that are flatter (or have minimal texture) are preferable and
    easier to clean.
  • Surfaces should also be uninterrupted whenever possible. Avoid crevices,
    reveals, piping, zippers and other areas that trap dust, dirt and other
    contaminants.
  • If zippers are used, barrier materials should be considered (behind the zipper) to
    minimize liquid penetration into the cushioning/filling materials, and sealed
    zippers should be encouraged. 

c) Ease of maintenance and repair:

  • Products should be designed for ease of cleanability. Where possible, parts
    (cushions, arm pads, etc.) should be easily removable and/or have
    removable covers to facilitate cleaning or replacement.

d) Other

  • In some instances, products may be subjected to heat or steam to eradicate
    pests (bed bugs, etc.). The construction and materials used in such products
    should be moisture resistant (impervious) to avoid damage to the internal
    components and mechanisms of the products. Consideration should be
    given to the fastener and component materials and/or finishes to prevent rust
    and corrosion if they are exposed to moisture and/or cleaning materials.
  • The application of hooks & loop style fasteners should be carefully designed to
    facilitate cleaning (eg, make cushions easily removable for cleaning).
    Inappropriately designed fastening systems may compromise the
    cleanability/maintainability of furniture (may collect debris, moisture, etc., and
    not be easily disinfected).
  • The use of antimicrobial inhibitors in materials and finishes is an emerging
    technology that is currently under investigation. No recommendation is
    given.
  • Stain blocking finishes may be utilized, but are no substitute for good cleaning
    practices/routines.
  • Manufacturers cleaning instructions geared to actual use and clinical
    practice should be provided for all product materials and finishes.